![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
zinnithI'm not usually prone to fandom wank, but I just have a few things to say regarding the ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
mckay_sheppard situation of the last days.
If you know me, you also know that I like constructive criticism. I like it when people let me know about my mistakes so that I can learn from them. I like to know whether or not my stories work for people. I like to know what works and what doesn't. Seeing as English is not my first language, I like to know about my spelling mistakes, my grammar mistakes, pretty much all the mistakes I make, because that's how I learn how not to do the same mistakes again.
I like doing the same for other writers. I like to help my friends make their stories better. If someone asks me for help, I'm happy to give it. It makes me happy to know that people value my opinion so much that they'll take my advice under consideration.
But something that's never ever okay is mockery. If you have a problem with another person's writing style, you have two choices. You can choose not to read the story, or you can choose to let the writer know how you feel the story could be improved in a nice way.
But if you instead choose to mock the story, you send the message that you find yourself superior to the other writer and the only thing you will achieve is to make her feel bad about herself, and maybe even stop writing altogether.
Writing is a personal thing and it is my firm opinion that you should always, always write for yourself. You should write the things you want to write, not the things your readers want you to write. That's how we, as individuals, keep our love of writing alive. That's how we, as a writing community, keep the diversity of our writing alive.
I'm not really familiar with the way the whole thing started. I know the basics, that some people apparently had problems with the length of another writer's stories. And that's fine, everyone is allowed to have their own opinion. There are, however, good and bad ways to express that opinion. What makes me very disappointed and sad is that I have been a big fan of some of the writers who have chosen to take part in the mockery. They have inspired me a lot in the past, and I expect more from them.
We all have a responsibility towards each other to keep our fandom a place where we can have fun together, where everyone can feel like they are welcome. We don't want an elitist fandom where only a few people dare to post stories. We owe it to each other and to ourselves to encourage other writers and help them improve their writing.
Of course, we also owe it to each other to listen to advice and constructive criticism. That's how we can keep the quality of SGA-stories as high as it is. But mockery is not the way to go.
Okay, rant over. Feel free to discuss.
mckay_sheppard situation of the last days.If you know me, you also know that I like constructive criticism. I like it when people let me know about my mistakes so that I can learn from them. I like to know whether or not my stories work for people. I like to know what works and what doesn't. Seeing as English is not my first language, I like to know about my spelling mistakes, my grammar mistakes, pretty much all the mistakes I make, because that's how I learn how not to do the same mistakes again.
I like doing the same for other writers. I like to help my friends make their stories better. If someone asks me for help, I'm happy to give it. It makes me happy to know that people value my opinion so much that they'll take my advice under consideration.
But something that's never ever okay is mockery. If you have a problem with another person's writing style, you have two choices. You can choose not to read the story, or you can choose to let the writer know how you feel the story could be improved in a nice way.
But if you instead choose to mock the story, you send the message that you find yourself superior to the other writer and the only thing you will achieve is to make her feel bad about herself, and maybe even stop writing altogether.
Writing is a personal thing and it is my firm opinion that you should always, always write for yourself. You should write the things you want to write, not the things your readers want you to write. That's how we, as individuals, keep our love of writing alive. That's how we, as a writing community, keep the diversity of our writing alive.
I'm not really familiar with the way the whole thing started. I know the basics, that some people apparently had problems with the length of another writer's stories. And that's fine, everyone is allowed to have their own opinion. There are, however, good and bad ways to express that opinion. What makes me very disappointed and sad is that I have been a big fan of some of the writers who have chosen to take part in the mockery. They have inspired me a lot in the past, and I expect more from them.
We all have a responsibility towards each other to keep our fandom a place where we can have fun together, where everyone can feel like they are welcome. We don't want an elitist fandom where only a few people dare to post stories. We owe it to each other and to ourselves to encourage other writers and help them improve their writing.
Of course, we also owe it to each other to listen to advice and constructive criticism. That's how we can keep the quality of SGA-stories as high as it is. But mockery is not the way to go.
Okay, rant over. Feel free to discuss.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-27 05:46 am (UTC)As I have understood it, one author in the comm posted a WIP very frequetly in very short installments (like, three sentences short...) This annoyed other members of the comm and they asked her to instead make compilations posts a couple of times every week, to spare people's flists. She was reluctant at first, and stated that she had resons for posting the way she did, but she was unwilling to discuss those reasons publicly. Eventually, she stopped posting the WIP and instead posted a link to the complete story when it was finished.
She did, however, keep posting drabbles and short short ficlets, and this kept annoying some members of the comm. Instead of letting the mods handle the problem (which they were in the process of doing) they thought it would be funny to post a series of 4-word stories, obviously directed at the first author. Since many of these authors are rather prominent in fandom, they got a lot of appreciative comments and encouragement from fans.
Now, I can see both sides of the argument. It can be annoying when someone posts WIP chapters several times a day, especially as they were so short. But on the other hand, the first author didn't break any existing rules and didn't deserve the treatment she recieved. She could have been more forthcoming and considerate to her fellow comm-members, but ganging up and publicly mocking someone you don't agree with is not something I'm willing to tolerate.
I see how the whole thing can be confusing if you missed it, but I'm really not interested in adding to the wank. I'm just hoping the poll will result in clear rules as to what is acceptable posting behavious and what isn't.